Comprehensive Guide -- 2026

Student Loan Discharge in Bankruptcy:
The Brunner Test and Beyond

The legal landscape for student loan discharge is changing faster than at any point in decades. The Brunner test remains the standard in most circuits, but the 2022 DOJ guidance and recent case law are fundamentally shifting outcomes. Here is how it actually works.

The Bottom Line

Student loans can be discharged in bankruptcy, but you must file a separate adversary proceeding and prove undue hardship under 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(8). The Brunner test sets the standard in most circuits. The November 2022 DOJ guidance has made the federal government far more willing to agree to discharge. If you have federal student loans and genuine financial hardship, the odds are better than they have been in a generation.

The Legal Foundation: Section 523(a)(8)

The Bankruptcy Code does not make student loans nondischargeable -- it makes them harder to discharge. The distinction matters.

11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(8) -- A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), 1228(b), or 1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt for an educational benefit overpayment or loan made, insured, or guaranteed by a governmental unit, or made under any program funded by a governmental unit or nonprofit institution, or for an obligation to repay funds received as an educational benefit, scholarship, or stipend, unless excepting such debt from discharge would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor's dependents.

The critical phrase is "unless excepting such debt from discharge would impose an undue hardship." Congress did not define "undue hardship" -- leaving it to the courts. Two main tests have emerged.

The Brunner Test: Three Prongs

The Brunner test comes from Brunner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp., 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987). It is the dominant standard, used by the majority of federal circuit courts.

The Three Prongs of Brunner

1

Minimal Standard of Living

Based on your current income and expenses, you cannot maintain a minimal standard of living for yourself and your dependents if forced to repay the loans. Courts look at actual income vs. actual necessary expenses -- housing, food, utilities, medical care, transportation.

2

Persistence of Circumstances

Additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period. Courts consider age, health conditions, disability, education level, employment history, and the remaining repayment term. This is often the hardest prong -- courts historically required something approaching a "certainty of hopelessness."

3

Good Faith Effort

You have made good-faith efforts to repay the loans. This does not require years of payments. Courts look at whether you explored income-driven repayment (IDR) plans, made payments when able, communicated with servicers, and generally did not ignore the obligation. Applying for and being denied payment reduction counts as good faith.

Criticism of the Brunner Test

The Brunner test has been widely criticized as too rigid. The second prong -- requiring proof that financial hardship will persist -- has been interpreted by some courts to require near-total hopelessness. Critics argue this goes far beyond what Congress intended when it used the phrase "undue hardship."

Even the judge who decided Brunner, Judge Keenan, applied it to deny discharge in a case where the debtor filed bankruptcy just months after graduating and before even beginning to look for work. The facts of Brunner itself were extreme, but the test it created has been applied far more broadly than the original case warranted.

The Alternative: Totality of the Circumstances

The First and Eighth Circuits reject the Brunner test in favor of a "totality of the circumstances" approach. Under this standard, courts consider all relevant factors holistically rather than requiring the debtor to satisfy three rigid prongs.

Factors courts consider include:

  • The debtor's past, present, and reasonably reliable future financial resources
  • The debtor's and dependents' reasonably necessary living expenses
  • Any other relevant facts and circumstances
  • The debtor's age, health, and number of dependents
  • Whether the debtor maximized income potential
  • Whether the debtor's expenses are reasonable
  • Whether the debtor's financial difficulties are likely to continue

This test is generally considered more debtor-friendly because it allows the court to weigh the complete picture rather than requiring rigid satisfaction of each prong.

The 2022 DOJ Guidance: A Sea Change

In November 2022, the Department of Justice and Department of Education issued joint guidance that fundamentally changed how the federal government handles student loan discharge cases.

What Changed

  • Attestation form: Debtors can complete a standardized form describing their financial situation, submitted through their bankruptcy case.
  • DOJ analysis: Rather than automatically opposing discharge, DOJ attorneys now evaluate the debtor's circumstances under a practical framework.
  • Recommendation to the court: If the DOJ's analysis supports discharge, it recommends discharge to the court instead of fighting the debtor.
  • Faster resolution: Cases that previously required full adversary litigation can now be resolved by agreement, saving time and money for everyone.

This matters because: The federal government is the creditor in the vast majority of student loan bankruptcy cases. When the DOJ agrees to discharge, the court almost always grants it. The DOJ's shift from adversary to evaluator has transformed outcomes.

The DOJ's Evaluation Factors

The DOJ guidance evaluates undue hardship by looking at:

  • Whether the debtor's income is at or below the poverty level
  • Whether the debtor has a disability or chronic health condition
  • Age of the debtor and years until retirement
  • Whether the debtor is on an income-driven repayment plan with a $0 payment
  • Length of time in repayment and total amounts already paid
  • Whether the debtor obtained a degree or benefited from the education

The Adversary Proceeding Process

Unlike other debts that are automatically discharged, student loan discharge requires filing a separate lawsuit within your bankruptcy case.

Step by Step

  1. File your bankruptcy case (Chapter 7 or Chapter 13) in the normal way.
  2. File an adversary proceeding complaint against each student loan holder/servicer. This is a separate filing with its own case number. Filing fee: approximately $350.
  3. Serve the complaint on the defendant (the loan holder or DOE).
  4. Complete the DOJ attestation form (for federal loans) and submit it through your case.
  5. Wait for the DOJ's analysis. If they support discharge, the case may resolve by stipulation.
  6. If contested: Discovery, potentially a trial before the bankruptcy judge.
  7. Court enters judgment -- full discharge, partial discharge, or denial.

Timing Considerations

You can file the adversary proceeding at any point during your bankruptcy case. In Chapter 7, most practitioners file it early. In Chapter 13, some wait until the end of the plan to demonstrate years of good-faith repayment effort. There is no specific deadline, but the adversary proceeding must be filed while the bankruptcy case is open.

Which Test Applies? Circuit-by-Circuit

CircuitTest UsedNotes
1st CircuitTotality of CircumstancesMore flexible standard
2nd CircuitBrunnerOrigin of the Brunner test; recent signals of reconsideration
3rd CircuitBrunner
4th CircuitBrunner
5th CircuitBrunner
6th CircuitBrunner
7th CircuitBrunner
8th CircuitTotality of CircumstancesMore flexible standard
9th CircuitBrunner
10th CircuitNot formally adoptedVaries by district
11th CircuitBrunner

Partial Discharge and Other Outcomes

Courts are not limited to all-or-nothing outcomes. Available relief includes:

  • Full discharge: All student loan debt eliminated.
  • Partial discharge: Court reduces the total amount owed. Increasingly common.
  • Discharge of some loans: If you have multiple loans, the court may discharge some but not others based on the circumstances of each.
  • Modified repayment terms: Some courts have reduced interest rates or modified repayment terms as an alternative to discharge.
  • Settlement: The creditor (often the DOJ for federal loans) may agree to a reduced payoff amount.

Private Student Loans

The DOJ guidance applies only to federal student loans. Private student loans are also subject to the undue hardship standard under Section 523(a)(8), but the creditor is a private lender rather than the federal government.

Key differences for private loans:

  • No DOJ attestation process -- you must litigate directly against the lender.
  • Private lenders may be more aggressive in opposing discharge.
  • However, private lenders also have smaller legal budgets and may settle to avoid litigation costs.
  • The same undue hardship standard applies -- Brunner or totality of circumstances, depending on your circuit.

Practical Advice

Building Your Case for Discharge

  • Apply for income-driven repayment (IDR). If your payment is $0 or nominal, this strongly supports Prong 1 (minimal standard of living) and Prong 3 (good faith).
  • Document everything. Medical records, disability determinations, unemployment records, rejection letters -- all support Prong 2 (persistence).
  • Do not ignore the loans. Communicate with servicers, apply for deferment or forbearance when needed, and explore repayment options. This builds the good-faith record.
  • Consider timing. The longer the gap between when you took the loans and when you file, the stronger your case. Filing decades after graduation with a history of unsuccessful repayment is much stronger than filing immediately after school.
  • Get legal help. The adversary proceeding is a real lawsuit. Legal aid organizations, law school clinics, and some bankruptcy attorneys handle these cases pro bono or on a contingency basis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Brunner test for student loan discharge?
The Brunner test (from Brunner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp., 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987)) requires proving three things: (1) you cannot maintain a minimal standard of living while repaying, (2) your situation is likely to persist, and (3) you have made good-faith repayment efforts. Most circuits use this test.
How did the 2022 DOJ guidance change things?
The DOJ now evaluates student loan discharge requests through an attestation form rather than automatically opposing discharge. When their analysis supports discharge, they recommend it to the court. This has significantly increased successful outcomes for federal loan borrowers.
Do I need to file a separate lawsuit to discharge student loans?
Yes. You must file an adversary proceeding (a separate lawsuit within your bankruptcy case) against each student loan holder. This has its own filing fee (~$350) and follows a litigation process including potential discovery and trial.
Can I get a partial discharge?
Yes. Courts can grant full discharge, partial discharge (reducing the total owed), discharge of some loans but not others, or modified repayment terms. Partial discharge has become more common in recent years.
Which circuits use the Brunner test?
Most circuits use Brunner: 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 9th, and 11th. The 1st and 8th Circuits use the more flexible "totality of the circumstances" test. The 10th Circuit has not formally adopted either test.

Related Resources

Brunner Test Deep Dive -- Detailed analysis of each prong

Undue Hardship Standard -- How courts define undue hardship

523a.org -- All exceptions to discharge under Section 523(a)

howtofilebankruptcy.org -- Step-by-step bankruptcy filing guide

Further Reading & Resources

Authority sources for deeper research on student loans and bankruptcy: